Mark The Truth

So it could never be distorted

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Science & Technology

Hazards of Indian Nuclear Inefficiency

E-mail Print
User Rating: / 1
PoorBest 
MTT - India - The weapon scientists at the 16 May press conference. From right Anil Kakodkar, Abdul Kalam, R. Chidambaram, and K. Santhanam.Three incidents in the past few months related to Indian quest for nuclear technology adequately serve to bare the wide chasm that separates the myths and reality concerning the country’s nuclear ambitions.  First; revelations by eminent Indian nuclear scientist, K. Santhanam confirming the long held suspicions in the global scientific community that the Indian nuclear test of a thermo nuclear device on May 11, 1998 was unsuccessful. The device, expected to provide a yield of 45 KT, “underperformed” says the former Defense Research and Development Organization top nuclear scientist who was the field director during the Pokharan II nuclear tests.
Read more...
 

Whistle at the Fizzle

E-mail Print

India claimed to have conducted a 45kt thermonuclear (fusion) test, a 15kt fission test and a 0.2kt experimental test on May 11, 1998, besides a 0.5kt test and a 0.3kt test on May. After the tests, India claimed that “the yields, estimated through close-in measurements, are consistent with design yields and have been confirmed by analysis of global and regional seismic data, by post-shot gamma radiation logging measurement and by radiochemical measurements on rock samples.”  However, majority of the foreign seismic experts remained skeptical of Indian claims.  They believed the yields to be overstated.

Read more...
 

Credibility of Indian Nuke Programme

E-mail Print
User Rating: / 7
PoorBest 

On August 27, 2009 in an interview with Times of India   K Santhanam, senior scientist and DRDO representative at Pokhran II admitted that the only thermonuclear device tested was a "fizzle". In nuclear parlance, a test is described as a fizzle when it fails to meet the desired yield.  Santhanam, was director for 1998 test site preparations in Pokhran test range, has stated hat the thermonuclear explosions conducted at that time were ‘actually of much below expectations and the tests were perhaps more a fizzle rather than a big bang’. This is the first time some Indian senior scientist gave some reservation about the nuke programme.  He was the closely associated with the 1998 tests.

Read more...
 



Google Groups
Subscribe to MarkTheTruth
Email:
Visit Us @ Google
What is your perception about MQM?